The short URL for this page is http://tumblr.com/xu53j1q41.
Share this URL on Twitter
Reply to this post on Twitter.
Notes: 28.
Originally posted on
tj's Tumblr named
Fun Size Bytes (from @Tj).
I reblogged this post from
rolandfox's Tumblr named
"Roland Fox"
-
doublejack liked this
-
inmi liked this
-
shakinbacon liked this
-
poeks liked this
-
tj reblogged this from rolandfox and added:
rolandfox wrote a helpful answer to part of my legal question:...I’m usually loathe to...
-
lisag732 liked this
-
monkeyfrog liked this
-
xntrek liked this
-
paulina liked this
-
ronbailey reblogged this from covertheearth and added:
People > Property. Even the assholes.
-
redcloud liked this
-
yayaa liked this
-
blanddiva11 liked this
-
pocketcontents liked this
-
coyotesqrl liked this
-
nolagrrlnyc liked this
-
brentgilliard liked this
-
do-over reblogged this from covertheearth and added:
Short answer: You may not create something or fix something onto any property — public or private — that can reasonably...
-
baileygenine liked this
-
covertheearth reblogged this from smartasshat and added:
I’d like to hear on this too. My neighbor’s yard was next to a street and people would constantly drive over it because...
-
ampersands liked this
-
smartasshat reblogged this from tj and added:
Also, I’ve heard...poison ivy window planters
-
jonathaneunice liked this
-
hellonurse liked this
-
rolandfox reblogged this from tj and added:
can see defining this...from Williams v. State, 518 So.2d 888. I pulled
-
mathcat345 liked this
-
swayingdawn liked this
-
tj posted this
Lawyer Friends: Please tell me CSI was wrong about this
rolandfox wrote a helpful answer to part of my legal question:
Difference between “manslaughter” and “criminally negligent homicide” is the difference between “recklessness” and “criminal negligence”; “reckless person” is aware of substantial and unjustifiable risk and consciously disregards it whereas a “criminally negligent person” is not aware of the risk created but should be and therefore cannot be said to consciously disregard it.
I’m usually loathe to reblog of myself, fearing blindness if nothing else, but this was extremely helpful.
It also makes a lot of sense, given the scenario described on the show: the guy who put up a cement-filled mailbox didn’t foresee that it might lead to someone’s death (as opposed to, say, wiring it with explosives).
I guess I’ve already read intentionality into the word “homicide” but that’s apparently not always the case.
Thanks, Roland!
(If I won the lottery and didn’t have to work for a living, I think I’d really enjoy going to law school, because I find the law fascinating, although not enough to go into debt to go to law school because I think I would find practicing law to be horrible, if for no other reason than my memory is excruciatingly shitty.)