Permalink / Short URL
Share this URL on Twitter
Notes: 22.
-
cheaperthanacupofjoe liked this
-
kimplasters liked this
-
misseffieb liked this
-
jonathaneunice liked this
-
coyotesqrl liked this
-
reagank reblogged this from tj and added:
(I’m going to cut down a whole lot, go read TJ’s original post for... I tend to find...
-
theme-test-rg reblogged this from tj and added:
TJ — please ignore this reblog. I’ve started a side tumblr to work on themes in and I needed a reblogged post to test...
-
hurtling liked this
-
timbalanced liked this
-
gdub liked this
-
saidme liked this
-
texburgher liked this
-
bananacasts liked this
-
smartasshat liked this
-
toldorknown liked this
-
yeahyouoverhere liked this
-
tbridge liked this
-
redcloud liked this
-
notactuallyme liked this
-
calebsexton liked this
-
tj posted this
Is this the greatest voice speaking on behalf of atheism?
Quoting Richard Dawkins :
The following is what passes for logic in the Tebow mind. His mother was advised by doctors to abort him, but she refused, which is why Tim is here. So abortion is a bad thing. Masterful conclusion.
And yet another observer misses the obvious point that the Tebow’s story is the “poster child” (so to speak) of pro-choice, assuming that your definition of “pro-choice” includes “can choose to keep a difficult pregnancy”.
If Dawkins was interested in making an argument, rather than belittling anyone with any religious beliefs as being obviously stupid, perhaps he’d be more careful. But like most apologists, he has quickly devolved into speaking only for those who already believe.
If you follow the ‘pro-life’ logic to its conclusion, a fertile woman is guilty of something equivalent to murder every time she refuses an offer of copulation.
Yes, and if you follow atheism to its logical conclusion it leads you to eat babies.
Richard Dawkins : Atheism :: Cory Doctorow : DRM